Partner

David J. Connaughton

Partner — Patents, IP Litigation & Post-Grant Proceedings

About David

David Connaughton's practice involves all aspects of intellectual property law including patents, trademarks, and copyrights, with a focus on patent application preparation and prosecution, and litigation matters. David has developed a reputation as an aggressive advocate for his clients, particularly in matters before the Federal Court and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). David's expertise is sought out nationwide by both clients as well as other attorneys for the complex and nuanced arguments required in matters such as appeals, inter partes review, and litigation, among others.

David holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering with a focus in Bioengineering and has been with Lambert Shortell & Connaughton since 2011. As an attorney registered to practice before the US Patent and Trademark Office, he has experience in all aspects of patent practice including patent application preparation and prosecution, among others.

David has prosecuted and obtained over six hundred (600) U.S. patents for clients in a wide variety of technological fields including mechanical, electrical, software, biotechnology, energy, and environmental innovations. David has also obtained patent registrations in numerous countries outside of the United States, in conjunction with foreign associates.

In addition to patent prosecution, David has been lead or assistant counsel on numerous patent litigations in the Federal Courts, particularly focusing on claim construction matters, infringement/non-infringement assertions, and validity/invalidity assertions. Further, David advises clients on all aspects of management, enforcement, and licensing of their patent portfolios.

David also has substantial experience in post grant proceedings before the US Patent Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), particularly inter partes review (IPR), post grant review (PGR), and ex parte reexamination to address the validity or invalidity of patents after they have issued. Through such proceedings, David has helped strategically and effectively invalidate and/or weaken the patent positions of opposing parties or to defend the patent validity positions of our clients.

Outside of the office, David enjoys hiking and being outdoors, as well as spending time with his wife and two sons. David recently summited Mt. Rainier in Washington after a two day climb. When he can, David enjoys working at craft beer festivals across the country pouring beer for a Portland, Maine brewery started by his cousin.

  • Practice Areas

Patent Drafting and Prosecution
IPR, PGR, Reexamination and other Post Grant Proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Patent Litigation and Patent Local Counsel
Trademark, Copyright, and other IP Litigation
IP Licensing and Sales

  • Education

Franklin Pierce Law Center
J.D. Law, 2010

University of New Hampshire
B.S. Chemical Engineering: Bioengineering
Honors: cum laude

  • Ex Parte Reexamination No. 90/019,652 — Representing Dynocom Industries to confirm validity of US Patent No. 8,505,374.
  • Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc (US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) — representing Range of Motion Products in a patent infringement lawsuit.
  • Dynocom Industries, Inc. v. Magicmotorsport S.R.I. (D. Mass. 2023) — representing Dynocom in a patent infringement suit.
  • BTL Industries Inc v. Rejuva Fresh, LLC (D. Maine 2023) — representing Rejuva Fresh in a patent and trademark infringement lawsuit.
  • Contempo Card Company, Inc. v. Superior Bindery, Inc. et al (D. Mass. 2023) — representing Superior Bindery in a patent infringement suit.
  • Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc (D. Maine 2022) — representing Range of Motion Products in a patent infringement lawsuit.
  • EDEN PARK ILLUMINATION, INC. et al. v. S. EDWARD NEISTER, IPR2022-00381 (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) — representing Neister in an Inter Partes Review (IPR) defending the validity of Neister's patent.
  • Endobotics LLC v Designs Standards Corp., et al. (D. Mass. 2020) — represented Design Standards in a patent infringement and trade secrets lawsuit.
  • Lu v. Hyper Bicycles, Inc. (D. Mass. 2020) — represented Hyper Bicycles in a patent infringement lawsuit.
  • ASM Assembly Systems Weymouth Ltd. et al v. Stentech, Inc. et al. (D. NH. 2018) — representing Stentech and Blue Ring in a patent infringement lawsuit.
  • EMSEAL Joint Systems, Ltd v. MM Systems Corporation (D. Mass. 2014) — represented MM Systems in a patent infringement lawsuit resulting in favorable claim construction and a non-infringement order.
  • Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd. v. Schul International Co., LLC, Willseal, LLC, et al. (D. N.H. 2014) — representing Schul, Willseal, and all other listed Defendants in a patent infringement lawsuit.
  • Tempnology LLC v. Grabber, Inc. (D. N.H. 2013) — Local counsel representing Grabber, Inc. in a patent infringement lawsuit.
  • Kar Enterprises, LLC v. Ford Motor Company (D. Mass. 2011) — representing Kar Enterprises, LLC in a patent infringement lawsuit against Ford Motor Company.
  • Schul International Company, LLC v. Emseal Joint Systems Ltd., PGR 2017-00053 (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) — represented Schul in a Post-Grant Review (PGR) asserting invalidity of Emseal's patent.
  • Schul International Company, LLC v. Emseal Joint Systems Ltd., PGR 2018-00034 (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) — represented Schul in a Post-Grant Review (PGR) asserting invalidity of Emseal's patent.
  • Clim-A-Tech Industries, Inc. v. William A. Ebert, IPR2017-01863 (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) — represented Mr. Ebert in an Inter Partes Review (IPR) successfully confirming the validity of Mr. Ebert's patent.
  • Ex Parte Steven E. Adams et al., Appeal 2019-004301 (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) — represented Mr. Adams and Worthen Industries successfully overturning an examiner's rejection of patent claims, resulting in an issued patent.
  • Ex Parte Jim Stearns et al., Appeal 2017-006116 (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) — represented Mr. Stearns successfully overturning an examiner's rejection of patent claims, resulting in an issued patent.
  • Massachusetts
  • Connecticut
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
  • Massachusetts Super Lawyers 2025-2026
  • Boston Magazine Top Lawyers — 2022
  • Rising Star, Massachusetts Super Lawyers, 2018 – 2020
  • Remedies for Unfair Trade and Patent Circumvention Caused by Pharmaceutical Price Controls, University of New Hampshire School of Law Newsletter, Spring 2010
  • www.lambertpatentlaw.com/blog
  • "They understood immediately what the problem was and from the very first conversation I felt relieved that I was in good hands. They delivered everything they had promised and within 6 weeks I had a positive outcome! I highly recommend this firm as honest, trustworthy and effective!"

    S

    Steve F.
    IP Dispute Client
  • "We worked with Brendan on 10 different trademarks and certification marks. He was very responsive, spent time with us, and really understands the area. Their prices are quite fair and they are not interested in spending extra time on things that just increase billings."

    R

    Roy G.
    Trademark Client
  • "For the past 10 years they have been knowledgeable, professional, responsive, intuitive and no-nonsense. I've obtained multiple design patents, utility patents and trademarks over the years thanks to their persistence and expertise. I would highly recommend this firm."

    H

    Holly D.
    Client Since 2010
  • "This is a great law firm for any IP patent and litigation related cases. Gary and his team without hesitation listened to me, quickly answered all my questions and revised every document in detail. From the beginning to the end, they have been responsive, competent and very professional on every level."

    J

    Jose M.
    Litigation Client

Work With David

Schedule a consultation to discuss your patent prosecution, IP litigation, or post-grant proceeding needs with an experienced intellectual property attorney.